Skip to main content

4.2.1 Absolute and relative poverty

Absolute and relative poverty 

Absolute poverty - the inability of a household to afford a basic standard of living/meet basic needs.  

Threshold irrespective of the economy being looked at, so few people in the UK are in absolute poverty due to the support systems in place (e.g benefits) 

WB defines extreme poverty as the % of population living off of less than $1.90 a day (PPP adjusted) 



Relative poverty - when a household has an income considerably lower than that of others in their country. In the UK the threshold for this is when income is 2/3 lower than the median income. 

This means that if you are in relative poverty you aren't necessarily in absolute poverty. People in the UK who are in relative poverty are not in absolute poverty as if they were in Zambia for example they would not be in poverty at all with their current income. 


Poverty is usually measured by looking at incomes. It could also be measured by seeing what basic household items are owned (e.g % of households that own a fridge)

Causes of changes in absolute and relative poverty 

NMW being put in place or changed - if set at a reasonable level, the NMW will reduce poverty among those who used to be paid less. In a monopsony, can also mean more people are being paid as employment increases. Relative and absolute poverty reduced. 

Economic growth - reduces absolute poverty by increasing employment, wages and tax revenue that can be used to provide services, but may actually increase relative poverty as inequality rises. Also may deplete finite resources, increasing poverty further down the line (global warming) 

Progressive taxation - those who earn more are taxed at higher rates, and this money can be redistributed to those earning less through benefits and state-provided services. This reduces relative poverty. 
However, if taxes are set too high, high income earners may move abroad, leading to a loss in revenue and labour for the country. 

Benefits/state provision - state-provided healthcare, education, transport, etc. all reduce inequality and relative poverty as those on lower incomes can receive the same quality of service as those on higher incomes. Better living standards. 

 These services, as well as benefits, redistribute income as they are funded by money collected through taxation, which those that are richer pay more of. 

 The issue with these is they reduce the incentive to work, especially if there are steep withdrawal rates, meaning that as one begins to earn more, the benefits that are removed from them may actually make them worse off. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Output gaps and the business cycle

Output gaps and the business cycle The fluctuation of real GDP around an underlying trend is a phenomenon known as the business cycle.  Output gap  - difference between the actual output of an economy and its potential output.  There are two types of output gap, trend and  potential.  Trend growth is the estimated rate of growth of an economy.  Trend output gaps:  Business cycle diagram A negative trend output gap is when real GDP is below trend GDP. The economy is producing below its trend.  e.g If real GDP is £1.8 trillion and trend GDP is £2 trillion then the negative output gap is £0.2 trillion.  Here the economy is in a bust  period. This is characterised by an expansion in GDP, high employment and high confidence. Price levels often rise, meaning inflation occurs.  A positive trend output gap is when real GDP is above trend GDP.  Here the economy is in a recession  (bust). This is characterised by a contraction in GDP, high unemployment and lo
Post a Comment
Read more

3.1.3 Demergers

Demergers   A demerger is the breaking up of a firm into separate firms.  e.g Sports Direct selling off Dunlop in 2016. PepsiCo splitting off foods businesses (KFC, Taco Bell, etc.) into a separate corporation, Yum Brands. Later Yum Brands demerged into Yum China and Yum Brands. Reasons for demergers Diseconomies of scale - the opposite of economies of scale, where average costs begin to rise as output increases. May occur due to it being difficult to retain control on the expanding business - principal-agent problem may arise. Also less co-operation by employees who feel more alienated and as a result less productive - they feel less of a connection to the business.  May also be hard to co-ordinate and communicate between locations and employees when a firm is large. Miscommunication can again lead to costs rising.  To focus on core businesses to streamline costs and improve profits. The firm may have expanded into different markets and experience disadvantages due to t
Post a Comment
Read more

3.4.1 Efficiency

Efficiency   Allocative efficiency  Output at which the marginal utility, or benefit, of a good to a consumer is the same as equal to the marginal cost of producing it.  This is seen on demand/supply curves, where D = S, output is produced as demand = marginal utility and supply = the sum of firms' marginal costs in an industry. On an individual scale, it is where:  AR = MC  Output is where the demand curve cuts the MC curve.   NB: technically occurs where MSB = MSC (if you consider externalities)  Occurs in perfect competition.  Eval - PC markets achieve allocative efficiency where there are no externalities.  LR equilibrium is where P = MPC, so if MSC > MPC, then there is an allocative inefficiency which leads to overproduction and consumption.  Productive efficiency  Output at which a good is produced at the  lowest possible average cost for a firm. This occurs at the minimum point of the AC curve.  AC = MC at this point, because w
Post a Comment
Read more