Skip to main content

4.2.1 Absolute and relative poverty

Absolute and relative poverty 

Absolute poverty - the inability of a household to afford a basic standard of living/meet basic needs.  

Threshold irrespective of the economy being looked at, so few people in the UK are in absolute poverty due to the support systems in place (e.g benefits) 

WB defines extreme poverty as the % of population living off of less than $1.90 a day (PPP adjusted) 



Relative poverty - when a household has an income considerably lower than that of others in their country. In the UK the threshold for this is when income is 2/3 lower than the median income. 

This means that if you are in relative poverty you aren't necessarily in absolute poverty. People in the UK who are in relative poverty are not in absolute poverty as if they were in Zambia for example they would not be in poverty at all with their current income. 


Poverty is usually measured by looking at incomes. It could also be measured by seeing what basic household items are owned (e.g % of households that own a fridge)

Causes of changes in absolute and relative poverty 

NMW being put in place or changed - if set at a reasonable level, the NMW will reduce poverty among those who used to be paid less. In a monopsony, can also mean more people are being paid as employment increases. Relative and absolute poverty reduced. 

Economic growth - reduces absolute poverty by increasing employment, wages and tax revenue that can be used to provide services, but may actually increase relative poverty as inequality rises. Also may deplete finite resources, increasing poverty further down the line (global warming) 

Progressive taxation - those who earn more are taxed at higher rates, and this money can be redistributed to those earning less through benefits and state-provided services. This reduces relative poverty. 
However, if taxes are set too high, high income earners may move abroad, leading to a loss in revenue and labour for the country. 

Benefits/state provision - state-provided healthcare, education, transport, etc. all reduce inequality and relative poverty as those on lower incomes can receive the same quality of service as those on higher incomes. Better living standards. 

 These services, as well as benefits, redistribute income as they are funded by money collected through taxation, which those that are richer pay more of. 

 The issue with these is they reduce the incentive to work, especially if there are steep withdrawal rates, meaning that as one begins to earn more, the benefits that are removed from them may actually make them worse off. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Income elasticity of demand (YED)

    Income elasticity of demand (YED)         % D QD/% D Y             Income elasticity of demand (YED): the responsiveness of the quantity demanded of a good to changes in consumer income. YED allows us to work out which goods are inferior, luxury and normal. When YED > 1 or <-1, demand is elastic. When YED is between -1 and 1, demand is inelastic. When YED < 0, goods/services are inferior. This means as income rises, demand for these goods decreases. (e.g. bus tickets) They vary inversely with income. When YED < -1, goods are very inferior (e.g. own-brand labels, cheap cuts of meat). When YED = 0, demand for the good is independent of income. When YED > 0, goods/services are normal. Demand for these goods vary directly with income, and the state of the economy. When YED is between 0 and 1, goods/services are necessary. When income increases, demand for these goods go up a proportional...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Philips curve

The Philips curve  The Philips curve suggests a tradeoff between unemployment and inflation - to decrease unemployment, inflation has to rise. This creates a conflict between two macroeconomic objectives - targeting inflation at 2% (in the UK) and decreasing unemployment. 
Post a Comment
Read more

3.1.3 Demergers

Demergers   A demerger is the breaking up of a firm into separate firms.  e.g Sports Direct selling off Dunlop in 2016. PepsiCo splitting off foods businesses (KFC, Taco Bell, etc.) into a separate corporation, Yum Brands. Later Yum Brands demerged into Yum China and Yum Brands. Reasons for demergers Diseconomies of scale - the opposite of economies of scale, where average costs begin to rise as output increases. May occur due to it being difficult to retain control on the expanding business - principal-agent problem may arise. Also less co-operation by employees who feel more alienated and as a result less productive - they feel less of a connection to the business.  May also be hard to co-ordinate and communicate between locations and employees when a firm is large. Miscommunication can again lead to costs rising.  To focus on core businesses to streamline costs and improve profits. The firm may have expanded into different markets and expe...
Post a Comment
Read more