Skip to main content

Taxation

Taxation 

Average rate of tax - percentage of an individual's income that goes to the government (so total tax paid/total income x100) 

Marginal rate of tax - percentage of tax paid on each additional dollar of income. 

Progressive taxes - where the marginal rate of tax rises as the amount subject to taxation rises. For example, income tax. As the amount of income increases, the rate of tax on each additional pound earned goes up, increasing the average rate of tax. 

- Good for reducing inequality. 

Regressive taxes - where the marginal rate of tax decreases as the amount subject to taxation rises. For example, excise duties (on tobacco/alcohol, etc.) As the amount spent on these goods increases, the rate of tax decreases, as a smaller percentage of the income is spent on tobacco/alcohol. The average rate of tax is lower for those with higher incomes. Therefore these taxes often are of a greater burden to the poorer and may increase inequality. 

Proportional taxes - where the tax rate is fixed so that the marginal rate of tax remains constant and so equal to the average rate of tax. For example, National Insurance Contributions (NICs). An increase in income leads to an equivalent percentage increase in tax paid. 

More here

Economic effects of changes in tax

Incentive to work 
Increasing direct tax rates (e.g income tax) decreases the incentive to work as one will get less on the money they have earned. As income tax is progressive, the more one earns the smaller the proportion of it they receive, so these further reduces the incentive to work. 

Decreasing direct tax rates would have the opposite effect. Lower taxes encourage people to work for more hours, increasing productivity. This is the substitution effect - as wages are worth more, work becomes more attractive than leisure. However, this only works up to a point - cut tax rates by too much and you get the income effect. As people have much higher wages it is easier to get the same amount of income by working fewer hours. People don't need to work as much if their work is highly paid. 

Increasing/decreasing indirect tax changes the amount of purchasing power a consumer has so impacts on the level of consumption, not so much the level of productivity. 

The Laffer Curve
The Laffer Curve shows the relationship between the tax rate and the total tax revenue collected. It suggests that initially an increase in the rate of tax increases the government's tax revenue, but only up to a certain point - the optimal tax rate. Beyond this point the tax revenue the government collects actually goes down. 
Laffer Curve
This is due to several factors: 

- 'Brain drain' - highly skilled workers leaving the country for another with more favourable tax rates 
- Increased tax evasion and/or tax avoidance
- Decreased incentive to work, so as there is less income, less revenue is collected. 

Income distribution 
Increasing direct taxes promotes equality, as those with a greater income have to pay more, so this revenue can be used to help those with less income. Increasing indirect taxes may promote inequality, as the goods make up a greater proportion of less wealthy people's incomes, so an increase in the price of the good affects them more. 

Real output and employment 
An increase in direct taxes decreases productivity, thus shifting AS in and decreasing real output (GDP). Note that this also increases the price level -> inflation. 
An increase in indirect taxes decreases consumption, this shifting in AD, again decreasing GDP but this time lowering the price level. 

Increasing indirect taxes can lead to lower employment as it reduces consumption and so firms take in less money, meaning they have to cut costs and may let go of workers/not hire workers they otherwise would have. On the other hand, the increase can lead to higher employment by the government if their tax revenue increases. These government employees would go on to increase consumption with their wages, leading to greater employment in other businesses. 

Price level
Increase in direct taxes decreases the amount of disposable income people have, as they are able to purchase less with their income. An increase in indirect taxes has the same effect in reducing the consumer's purchasing power. This has the effect of reducing consumption and AD, therefore lowering the price level. This can lead to deflation. The opposite (a decrease in taxes) could therefore lead to inflation. 

The trade balance 
The trade balance is a country's exports minus its imports (X-M). 

FDI flows 
FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) could increase as taxes increase as higher taxes are a sign of national stability. Firms would be more confident in investing in the country.  This increase in investment would shift AD out, increasing GDP. 

However, FDI might also decrease as taxes increase as it becomes more expensive to set up a business in the country as higher taxes means higher costs of production for firms. The investment might instead go to a country with lower taxes. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Output gaps and the business cycle

Output gaps and the business cycle The fluctuation of real GDP around an underlying trend is a phenomenon known as the business cycle.  Output gap  - difference between the actual output of an economy and its potential output.  There are two types of output gap, trend and  potential.  Trend growth is the estimated rate of growth of an economy.  Trend output gaps:  Business cycle diagram A negative trend output gap is when real GDP is below trend GDP. The economy is producing below its trend.  e.g If real GDP is £1.8 trillion and trend GDP is £2 trillion then the negative output gap is £0.2 trillion.  Here the economy is in a bust  period. This is characterised by an expansion in GDP, high employment and high confidence. Price levels often rise, meaning inflation occurs.  A positive trend output gap is when real GDP is above trend GDP.  Here the economy is in a recession  (bust). This is characterised by a contraction in GDP, high unemployment and lo

3.1.3 Demergers

Demergers   A demerger is the breaking up of a firm into separate firms.  e.g Sports Direct selling off Dunlop in 2016. PepsiCo splitting off foods businesses (KFC, Taco Bell, etc.) into a separate corporation, Yum Brands. Later Yum Brands demerged into Yum China and Yum Brands. Reasons for demergers Diseconomies of scale - the opposite of economies of scale, where average costs begin to rise as output increases. May occur due to it being difficult to retain control on the expanding business - principal-agent problem may arise. Also less co-operation by employees who feel more alienated and as a result less productive - they feel less of a connection to the business.  May also be hard to co-ordinate and communicate between locations and employees when a firm is large. Miscommunication can again lead to costs rising.  To focus on core businesses to streamline costs and improve profits. The firm may have expanded into different markets and experience disadvantages due to t

3.4.1 Efficiency

Efficiency   Allocative efficiency  Output at which the marginal utility, or benefit, of a good to a consumer is the same as equal to the marginal cost of producing it.  This is seen on demand/supply curves, where D = S, output is produced as demand = marginal utility and supply = the sum of firms' marginal costs in an industry. On an individual scale, it is where:  AR = MC  Output is where the demand curve cuts the MC curve.   NB: technically occurs where MSB = MSC (if you consider externalities)  Occurs in perfect competition.  Eval - PC markets achieve allocative efficiency where there are no externalities.  LR equilibrium is where P = MPC, so if MSC > MPC, then there is an allocative inefficiency which leads to overproduction and consumption.  Productive efficiency  Output at which a good is produced at the  lowest possible average cost for a firm. This occurs at the minimum point of the AC curve.  AC = MC at this point, because w