Skip to main content

Labour elasticity of demand

Labour elasticity of demand 

%ΔQuantity of labour demanded/%ΔWages

Labour elasticity of demand (LED) is the responsiveness of demand for labour when there is a change in the wage rate. 


It is affected by:

How easy/costly it is to substitute other factors of production for labour. 
Labour is more elastic when it can easily be replaced by capital inputs. For example, if workers can easily/inexpensively be replaced by machines that do the same thing, then a rise in wages will result in a dramatic decline in workers needed. The demand curve in this case would be elastic. 

The proportion of costs that is represented by labour expenses (wages) in a firm. 
A higher percentage of the total costs means that labour is more elastic. This would be the case in firms that are more labour intensive. A restaurant is likely to be more elastic in terms of labour demand than a manufacturing firm, as if wages go up, it is hiring so many workers that its overall costs are likely to go up a lot, so it has to lay off workers to counter this. 

The price elasticity of demand (PED) of the product itself. 
If the PED of the product is elastic, the LED is also likely to be elastic. 

Time horizon 
The longer the time period the more likely it is that the firm has found substitutes for labour such as capital. So in the long run labour becomes more elastic. 

 More here 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Business Growth

Why do businesses grow?  Profit motive Businesses grow to make more profit by increasing revenue. Selling more to more people often means profits increase.  The valuation of a company's share is often influenced by how it is expected to do in the future (ie how much profit it is likely to make). When it is projected to do well, share prices increase, and it is valued more highly on the stock market. This provides incentive for companies to increase profits, doing well on the stock market increases investment and raises more money.  Cost motive - economies of scale When firms are larger, relative costs are smaller. This is because some costs are fixed, so if you are a larger company, producing larger output, the cost per unit will decrease.  e.g. If a T-shirt factory's main cost is the £10,000 to rent to factory each month, and it produces only 1000 shirts a month, each shirt costs £10 to make. But if it scales up and produces 100,000 shirts a month, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Philips curve

The Philips curve  The Philips curve suggests a tradeoff between unemployment and inflation - to decrease unemployment, inflation has to rise. This creates a conflict between two macroeconomic objectives - targeting inflation at 2% (in the UK) and decreasing unemployment. 
Post a Comment
Read more

3.1.3 Demergers

Demergers   A demerger is the breaking up of a firm into separate firms.  e.g Sports Direct selling off Dunlop in 2016. PepsiCo splitting off foods businesses (KFC, Taco Bell, etc.) into a separate corporation, Yum Brands. Later Yum Brands demerged into Yum China and Yum Brands. Reasons for demergers Diseconomies of scale - the opposite of economies of scale, where average costs begin to rise as output increases. May occur due to it being difficult to retain control on the expanding business - principal-agent problem may arise. Also less co-operation by employees who feel more alienated and as a result less productive - they feel less of a connection to the business.  May also be hard to co-ordinate and communicate between locations and employees when a firm is large. Miscommunication can again lead to costs rising.  To focus on core businesses to streamline costs and improve profits. The firm may have expanded into different markets and expe...
Post a Comment
Read more