Skip to main content

Do the FANGs need to be regulated?

Do the FANGs need to be regulated? 

FANGs – Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google.



Harms to consumer
Benefits to consumer
Positives of regulation
Negatives of regulation
Damages democracy by creating filter bubbles. Decreasing diversity in opinions/goods/services available to people due to the lack of competition.
Provide services for free/inexpensive.
Trust-busting (trusts are large companies with lots of market power) to open up opportunities for competition. 
Possible increasing costs, loss of network effects/economies of scale. So lower profits.
Addictive – studies have found people who spend lots of time on social media to be more depressed. Business models encourage unhealthy/addictive behaviour.
More personalised user experience, as FANGs have the data to make this possible.

Hard to price regulate companies that don’t charge
Price control backfires when companies don’t charge!
Barriers to switching services – in some cases there is no alternative at all.
Network effects - can make user experience better.

Disincentive for companies to scale up
Privacy concerns.


Regulatory capture
Extreme material.



Promotes inequality (?)





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Business Growth

Why do businesses grow?  Profit motive Businesses grow to make more profit by increasing revenue. Selling more to more people often means profits increase.  The valuation of a company's share is often influenced by how it is expected to do in the future (ie how much profit it is likely to make). When it is projected to do well, share prices increase, and it is valued more highly on the stock market. This provides incentive for companies to increase profits, doing well on the stock market increases investment and raises more money.  Cost motive - economies of scale When firms are larger, relative costs are smaller. This is because some costs are fixed, so if you are a larger company, producing larger output, the cost per unit will decrease.  e.g. If a T-shirt factory's main cost is the £10,000 to rent to factory each month, and it produces only 1000 shirts a month, each shirt costs £10 to make. But if it scales up and produces 100,000 shirts a month, ...

3.4.1 Efficiency

Efficiency   Allocative efficiency  Output at which the marginal utility, or benefit, of a good to a consumer is the same as equal to the marginal cost of producing it.  This is seen on demand/supply curves, where D = S, output is produced as demand = marginal utility and supply = the sum of firms' marginal costs in an industry. On an individual scale, it is where:  AR = MC  Output is where the demand curve cuts the MC curve.   NB: technically occurs where MSB = MSC (if you consider externalities)  Occurs in perfect competition.  Eval - PC markets achieve allocative efficiency where there are no externalities.  LR equilibrium is where P = MPC, so if MSC > MPC, then there is an allocative inefficiency which leads to overproduction and consumption.  Productive efficiency  Output at which a good is produced at the  lowest possible average cost for a firm. This oc...

3.3.4 Normal profits, supernormal profits and losses

Normal profits, supernormal profits and losses  Profit maximisation  Occurs at: MC = MR  where MC cuts MR from below (as where it cuts from above is point of profit minimisation)  This is because past this point MR < MC , and each additional good is costing the firm more than it is making. Before that point MR > MC so the firm can increase profit by producing more.  NB - point of prof max can be found using TC and TR:  Normal and supernormal profit and losses Normal profit is profit that covers the opportunity cost of capital and is just sufficient to keep the firm in the market.  Supernormal/economic profit are profits that exceed normal profits.  When AC lies below AR at the point of output, the difference between AR and AC is the supernormal profit on that unit output. The overall supernormal profit is the difference times the quantity sold (Q2 in the above)....