Skip to main content

Do the FANGs need to be regulated?

Do the FANGs need to be regulated? 

FANGs – Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google.

https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21735026-which-antitrust-remedies-welcome-which-fight-techlash-against-amazon-facebook-and


Harms to consumer
Benefits to consumer
Positives of regulation
Negatives of regulation
Damages democracy by creating filter bubbles. Decreasing diversity in opinions/goods/services available to people due to the lack of competition.
Provide services for free/inexpensive.
Trust-busting (trusts are large companies with lots of market power) to open up opportunities for competition. 
Possible increasing costs, loss of network effects/economies of scale. So lower profits.
Addictive – studies have found people who spend lots of time on social media to be more depressed. Business models encourage unhealthy/addictive behaviour.
More personalised user experience, as FANGs have the data to make this possible.

Hard to price regulate companies that don’t charge
Price control backfires when companies don’t charge!
Barriers to switching services – in some cases there is no alternative at all.
Network effects - can make user experience better.

Disincentive for companies to scale up
Privacy concerns.


Regulatory capture
Extreme material.



Promotes inequality (?)





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Income elasticity of demand (YED)

    Income elasticity of demand (YED)         % D QD/% D Y             Income elasticity of demand (YED): the responsiveness of the quantity demanded of a good to changes in consumer income. YED allows us to work out which goods are inferior, luxury and normal. When YED > 1 or <-1, demand is elastic. When YED is between -1 and 1, demand is inelastic. When YED < 0, goods/services are inferior. This means as income rises, demand for these goods decreases. (e.g. bus tickets) They vary inversely with income. When YED < -1, goods are very inferior (e.g. own-brand labels, cheap cuts of meat). When YED = 0, demand for the good is independent of income. When YED > 0, goods/services are normal. Demand for these goods vary directly with income, and the state of the economy. When YED is between 0 and 1, goods/services are necessary. When income increases, demand for these goods go up a proportional...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Philips curve

The Philips curve  The Philips curve suggests a tradeoff between unemployment and inflation - to decrease unemployment, inflation has to rise. This creates a conflict between two macroeconomic objectives - targeting inflation at 2% (in the UK) and decreasing unemployment. 
Post a Comment
Read more

3.1.3 Demergers

Demergers   A demerger is the breaking up of a firm into separate firms.  e.g Sports Direct selling off Dunlop in 2016. PepsiCo splitting off foods businesses (KFC, Taco Bell, etc.) into a separate corporation, Yum Brands. Later Yum Brands demerged into Yum China and Yum Brands. Reasons for demergers Diseconomies of scale - the opposite of economies of scale, where average costs begin to rise as output increases. May occur due to it being difficult to retain control on the expanding business - principal-agent problem may arise. Also less co-operation by employees who feel more alienated and as a result less productive - they feel less of a connection to the business.  May also be hard to co-ordinate and communicate between locations and employees when a firm is large. Miscommunication can again lead to costs rising.  To focus on core businesses to streamline costs and improve profits. The firm may have expanded into different markets and expe...
Post a Comment
Read more